Team Teaching Rubric

*This team teaching rubrics is copy lifted from Philippines-Australia Basic Education Assistance for Mindanao Field Study Manual 3

Note: This will serve as guide to the Cooperating Teachers and TEI Practicum Supervisor in assessing the actual teaching performance done by the Pre-Service Teachers. Check the box below that correspond each items.

Legend:           100 – 95          – Excellent (E) 

                        94 – 89              – Very Satisfactory (VS)

                        88 – 83              – Satisfactory (S)

                        82 – 78              – Fair (F)

                        77 – 72              – Unsatisfactory (U)

ITEMS TO RATE	E	VS	S	F	U
I. LESSON PLAN A. Objectives were stated in behavioral term
B. There were congruence between; Objective/s and subject matter Objective/s and materials used Objective/s and teaching procedure/ Strategies in Teaching Objectives and formative test/evaluation Objectives and assignment
III. TEACHING METHOD A. Method/s use was/were suited to the needs and capabilities of the students.
B. The teacher was creative enough to adapt his/her method to the students’ capabilities.
C. Visual aids and other examples were used to illustrate the lesson.
D. The teacher made effective use of the formative test after teaching
III. CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT A. The teacher had systematic way of checking:       Attendance       Assignments/Homework       Practice exercise       Group Work/Project       Passing in and out of the classroom    Correcting, distributing and collecting paper
B. Order and discipline were present in the classroom
C. Visual aids were within each reach of the teacher during his/her teaching.
IV. COMMUNICATION SKILLS A. The Teacher spoke clearly with a well-modulated voice
B. The teacher use correct grammar in speaking
C. Correct responses were given by the students through the teacher’s skillful questioning
D. He/She observed correct pronunciation
E. The board work of the teacher was free of errors in grammar and spelling
F. The teacher’s handwriting on the board and the lesson plan was legible enough to be read and understood
V. TEACHER’S PERSONALITY A. The teacher is neat and well-groomed
B. The teacher is free from mannerism or physical defects that tends to disturb the students’ attention
C. the teacher’s personality is strong enough to command respect and attention

·         The pre-service teacher’s strengths are:

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

·         Comments/Suggestion for improvement

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

·         Final Rating (Tick One) [   ] Satisfactory        [   ] Unsatisfactory

Rated by: ___________________________________       ____    Date: __________________

Designation: __________________________________